This combination of textile materiality and biology enables the project’s concept to be really thought provoking. The collection creates an introduction into what could be the future of textiles production. Ideas have the potential to move onto the creation of full garments and accessories that could fully grow from the skin through “tissue implants”.
This vision however comes with many ethical question and “implications”. Are we controlling too much of the world? Is genetic and biology modification a step too far? Our ever-changing desire for the new “IT” fabric or item of clothing, the highest quality, a bespoke, one-of-a-kind piece means that the role of the new designer is becoming an extremely challenging one. To reach these design desires exciting concepts like these need to be produced. It is hard not to be inspired by the amazing tactility and aesthetic of Chieza’s collection.
Even though the ethics of the project are questionable, environmental aspects of the textile pieces and their production could push the concept’s development. Much of textile production uses and depends on a great number of non-renewable resources, especially those used in the manufacture of synthetic fibres and fabrics which include coal and oil. Is the use of stem cells in textile production therefore a more sustainable and environmental conserving process that we may have no choice but to use in the future, by “2075”?
Emily Smith, a “2012” “BA Textiles design” graduate at “Chelsea College of Art and Design”, considers the “sustainability” and “durability” of design in her garment and jewellery collection. The work looks at personal “memories” and takes much inspiration from “old imagery”. “Colours” have been “extracted” to create “soft”, “subtle” palettes on the delicate “chiffon” fabrics. The collection is very conceptual and identifies different types of “memories” and how we store, collect and remember these experiences, “connecting” our “past to our present”. Emily looks at memories that “fade away” and seem quite “distant” as well as those that are presented at the “forefront” of our minds, the memories that we hold close and “preserve”. These differences are shown in the pieces through the contrasting textures of the “chiffon” and the “clear plastic resin jewellery”. Characteristics of both materials connect them to the type of memory they represent; the fluid “chiffon”, a “fading” memory and the robust “resin”, an “encapsulated” remembrance.
Emily Smith has questioned whether connecting clothing and accessories to personal experiences and therefore creating a “bond” and “attachment” with our “belongings” could be a solution to our materialistic “over consumption” in “fast fashion”. “Investing” “emotion” and “time” in designing and manufacture gives “meaning” to fabrics which would eliminate the want to “replace” and upgrade items so quickly. This therefore would give clothing a higher “durability”, reducing the scale of production and use of materials.
Design Catwalk. (2011, June 20). Is Fashion ART? [Web log Post]. Retrieved from http://www.designcatwalk.com/design-fictions-posthumanity-in-the-age-of-synthetics/
Textile Futures (2011). NATSAI AUDREY CHIEZA. Retrieved from http://www.textilefutures.co.uk/graduates/2011-2/natsai-audrey-chieza/.
Textiles Futures Research Centre (n.d). Textiles Futures Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.tfrc.org.uk.
SokFok Studio (producer). (2012). Emily Smith - BA Textile Design 2012 [audio podcast]. Retrieved from http://vimeo.com/49154538






No comments:
Post a Comment